https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120402 The case involved issues regarding the admission of a settlement application, immunity from interest and prosecution, jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission, and the contractual obligation to pay interest under a bond. The Bench concluded that due to the applicant's refusal to accept the interest liability, the case was sent back to the proper officer for disposal as if no application had been made under Section 127B of the Act. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:10:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120402 The case involved issues regarding the admission of a settlement application, immunity from interest and prosecution, jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission, and the contractual obligation to pay interest under a bond. The Bench concluded that due to the applicant's refusal to accept the interest liability, the case was sent back to the proper officer for disposal as if no application had been made under Section 127B of the Act. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120402