<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 614 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) assessee, affirming their right to choose indexation for long-term capital assets and set off losses calculated with indexation against gains computed without indexation. The Tribunal clarified that the assessee could opt for different tax rates based on the method of computation, supported by relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:59:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 614 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) assessee, affirming their right to choose indexation for long-term capital assets and set off losses calculated with indexation against gains computed without indexation. The Tribunal clarified that the assessee could opt for different tax rates based on the method of computation, supported by relevant legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>