<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 641 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, MADRAS BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120384</link>
    <description>Adverse service remarks in an annual confidential report were held unsustainable where they were communicated after the prescribed time, the employee&#039;s representation was decided beyond the stipulated period, and the communication disclosed only the adverse portions without the accompanying favourable remarks. The record also did not disclose any material basis for the adverse assessment, despite the reporting file indicating the employee&#039;s work output. On that footing, the adverse entries were liable to be expunged and the rejection of the representation was liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 641 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, MADRAS BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120384</link>
      <description>Adverse service remarks in an annual confidential report were held unsustainable where they were communicated after the prescribed time, the employee&#039;s representation was decided beyond the stipulated period, and the communication disclosed only the adverse portions without the accompanying favourable remarks. The record also did not disclose any material basis for the adverse assessment, despite the reporting file indicating the employee&#039;s work output. On that footing, the adverse entries were liable to be expunged and the rejection of the representation was liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>