https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120381 Settlement applications were treated as admissible where the pending Tribunal appeals had been withdrawn and the matter was regarded as pending before the central excise officer under the settlement provisions. The applicants had filed the required returns and made a disclosure of additional duty liability beyond the prescribed threshold, satisfying the statutory conditions for admission. Questions on the exact extent of disclosure, alleged duplication in quantification, and the correct basis for duty computation were left for final disposal. On that basis, the Commission held the applications admissible and permitted them to proceed, with exclusive jurisdiction attaching once the settlement conditions were met. en-us Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:14:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120381 Settlement applications were treated as admissible where the pending Tribunal appeals had been withdrawn and the matter was regarded as pending before the central excise officer under the settlement provisions. The applicants had filed the required returns and made a disclosure of additional duty liability beyond the prescribed threshold, satisfying the statutory conditions for admission. Questions on the exact extent of disclosure, alleged duplication in quantification, and the correct basis for duty computation were left for final disposal. On that basis, the Commission held the applications admissible and permitted them to proceed, with exclusive jurisdiction attaching once the settlement conditions were met. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120381