<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 282 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that repacking standard packets of Soda Ash into smaller packets did not amount to manufacture under Note 10 of Chapter 28. It was held that the process did not enhance marketability or meet the definition of manufacture as per relevant notes to the chapters. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and penalty imposed under Section 11AC, citing that the appellant&#039;s actions did not constitute manufacture. The decision was based on distinguishing between repacking from bulk pack to retail pack, leading to the waiver of the entire amount pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:13:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 282 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that repacking standard packets of Soda Ash into smaller packets did not amount to manufacture under Note 10 of Chapter 28. It was held that the process did not enhance marketability or meet the definition of manufacture as per relevant notes to the chapters. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and penalty imposed under Section 11AC, citing that the appellant&#039;s actions did not constitute manufacture. The decision was based on distinguishing between repacking from bulk pack to retail pack, leading to the waiver of the entire amount pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>