<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 386 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the repair expenses incurred by the assessee for business premises were revenue expenditure and not capital in nature. Therefore, the repair expenses were held to be allowable under section 37 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 386 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the repair expenses incurred by the assessee for business premises were revenue expenditure and not capital in nature. Therefore, the repair expenses were held to be allowable under section 37 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>