<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 279 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120374</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the Appellant against the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and allowed the appeal, finding that the price of &quot;Hardener KN 75&quot; was not influenced by being sold with other products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 279 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120374</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the Appellant against the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and allowed the appeal, finding that the price of &quot;Hardener KN 75&quot; was not influenced by being sold with other products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>