<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 425 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120353</link>
    <description>Imported melting scrap covered by Circular No. 56/2004-Cus. dated 18-10-2004, because the bills of lading were prior to 25-10-2004, was required to be cleared only after 100% physical examination. The record showed that such examination was carried out and no offending material was found. On that factual basis, the Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate requirement did not apply to these consignments, so confiscation solely for non-production of that certificate was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 425 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120353</link>
      <description>Imported melting scrap covered by Circular No. 56/2004-Cus. dated 18-10-2004, because the bills of lading were prior to 25-10-2004, was required to be cleared only after 100% physical examination. The record showed that such examination was carried out and no offending material was found. On that factual basis, the Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate requirement did not apply to these consignments, so confiscation solely for non-production of that certificate was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>