<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 407 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120331</link>
    <description>Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was examined as to whether duty remission could be granted for inputs and finished goods destroyed in a fire. The analysis states that remission is available only within the Commissioner&#039;s statutory power and subject to the prescribed conditions, and that it does not extend to inputs already issued for processing. On that reasoning, goods not issued for processing alone were treated as eligible for such relief, and the order dropping the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 407 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120331</link>
      <description>Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was examined as to whether duty remission could be granted for inputs and finished goods destroyed in a fire. The analysis states that remission is available only within the Commissioner&#039;s statutory power and subject to the prescribed conditions, and that it does not extend to inputs already issued for processing. On that reasoning, goods not issued for processing alone were treated as eligible for such relief, and the order dropping the demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>