<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 400 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120322</link>
    <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly on its own language, and its scope cannot be enlarged by substituting or stretching words not used in the instrument. The note explains that the phrase &quot;brought in connection with&quot; in Notification No. 1/95-C.E. was to be given its plain meaning, rather than read as equivalent to &quot;used in or in relation to&quot; manufacture. On that construction, capital goods received by a 100% export oriented unit without payment of duty were treated as eligible for the exemption, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:41:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 400 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120322</link>
      <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly on its own language, and its scope cannot be enlarged by substituting or stretching words not used in the instrument. The note explains that the phrase &quot;brought in connection with&quot; in Notification No. 1/95-C.E. was to be given its plain meaning, rather than read as equivalent to &quot;used in or in relation to&quot; manufacture. On that construction, capital goods received by a 100% export oriented unit without payment of duty were treated as eligible for the exemption, and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>