<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 398 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as time-barred due to a significant delay of 924 days in filing the appeal, despite being granted liberty by the High Court. The explanation provided for the delay was deemed insufficient, as the liberty to file appeals had already been granted. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The importance of promptly exercising rights granted by the court, such as filing appeals and applying for condonation of delay, was emphasized, as failure to do so can result in adverse consequences, as evidenced by the outcome in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:37:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 398 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as time-barred due to a significant delay of 924 days in filing the appeal, despite being granted liberty by the High Court. The explanation provided for the delay was deemed insufficient, as the liberty to file appeals had already been granted. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The importance of promptly exercising rights granted by the court, such as filing appeals and applying for condonation of delay, was emphasized, as failure to do so can result in adverse consequences, as evidenced by the outcome in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>