<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 336 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120313</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal due to a delay of around 106 days in filing the appeal against an order-in-appeal. The delay was attributed to administrative reasons related to the Chief Commissioner&#039;s office. The Tribunal found that the order-in-appeal was accepted by the relevant authorities without any grounds for appeal. Emphasizing that administrative delays without reasonable explanations are insufficient to condone delays, the Tribunal concluded that the revenue&#039;s appeal was not justified. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay and the appeal were both dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 336 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120313</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal due to a delay of around 106 days in filing the appeal against an order-in-appeal. The delay was attributed to administrative reasons related to the Chief Commissioner&#039;s office. The Tribunal found that the order-in-appeal was accepted by the relevant authorities without any grounds for appeal. Emphasizing that administrative delays without reasonable explanations are insufficient to condone delays, the Tribunal concluded that the revenue&#039;s appeal was not justified. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay and the appeal were both dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>