https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120302 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside duty demands for the larger period due to the appellant's genuine belief regarding brand name usage. The appellant was granted the benefit of cum-duty and Modvat credit for six months, with a re-computation of duty ordered. Penalties were also set aside based on the appellant's lack of deliberate suppression of facts, and interest was deemed applicable only for a specific period. The matter was remanded for further adjudication by the Original Authority. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:00:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120302 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside duty demands for the larger period due to the appellant's genuine belief regarding brand name usage. The appellant was granted the benefit of cum-duty and Modvat credit for six months, with a re-computation of duty ordered. Penalties were also set aside based on the appellant's lack of deliberate suppression of facts, and interest was deemed applicable only for a specific period. The matter was remanded for further adjudication by the Original Authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120302