https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120292 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for alleged abetment in importing illicit goods, ruling in favor of the appellant. Despite providing his address for the importation, the appellant was found to have acted in good faith and without knowledge of the illicit nature of the goods. The Tribunal determined that the Revenue failed to establish the appellant's involvement in abetment, citing relevant judgments and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:41:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120292 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for alleged abetment in importing illicit goods, ruling in favor of the appellant. Despite providing his address for the importation, the appellant was found to have acted in good faith and without knowledge of the illicit nature of the goods. The Tribunal determined that the Revenue failed to establish the appellant's involvement in abetment, citing relevant judgments and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120292