<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 482 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding the confiscation and duty confirmation but significantly reducing the redemption fine and personal penalties. The confiscation of foreign currency and related penalties were set aside due to inconsistencies and lack of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 482 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding the confiscation and duty confirmation but significantly reducing the redemption fine and personal penalties. The confiscation of foreign currency and related penalties were set aside due to inconsistencies and lack of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>