<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 273 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120226</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the applications to vacate interim relief as they were filed after 180 days from when the stay was granted, as per Section 35 of the law. The applications were considered infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 273 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120226</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the applications to vacate interim relief as they were filed after 180 days from when the stay was granted, as per Section 35 of the law. The applications were considered infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>