<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 313 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120194</link>
    <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined where the fixed freight shown separately in invoices was prima facie not the actual transportation cost contemplated by the valuation rules and could be included in transaction value. The labour and painting charges were also treated as prima facie includible because the repair-work explanation had not been raised earlier and appeared belated. Financial hardship and the unit&#039;s sickness did not justify total waiver, although the unit&#039;s running condition was considered. Interim protection against recovery was granted subject to deposit within the stipulated time, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:55:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 313 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120194</link>
      <description>Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined where the fixed freight shown separately in invoices was prima facie not the actual transportation cost contemplated by the valuation rules and could be included in transaction value. The labour and painting charges were also treated as prima facie includible because the repair-work explanation had not been raised earlier and appeared belated. Financial hardship and the unit&#039;s sickness did not justify total waiver, although the unit&#039;s running condition was considered. Interim protection against recovery was granted subject to deposit within the stipulated time, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>