https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120191 A stay of operation against an appellate classification order was refused because, at the interlocutory stage, the goods appeared prima facie to fall under the specific tariff entry in Chapter 29 rather than as an insecticide under Chapter 38. The Tribunal noted that the cited precedent did not appear to govern the product in dispute and left the classification controversy for regular hearing. No final determination on the merits of tariff classification was made in this stage. en-us Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:41:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120191 A stay of operation against an appellate classification order was refused because, at the interlocutory stage, the goods appeared prima facie to fall under the specific tariff entry in Chapter 29 rather than as an insecticide under Chapter 38. The Tribunal noted that the cited precedent did not appear to govern the product in dispute and left the classification controversy for regular hearing. No final determination on the merits of tariff classification was made in this stage. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120191