<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 422 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120182</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the Tribunal determined that the delay in filing the application for registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act should have been condoned. It was found that the trustees were not aware of the requirement to file within the prescribed period, and the delay was considered bona fide. Consequently, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act were made applicable to the trust from its inception.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:06:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 422 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120182</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the Tribunal determined that the delay in filing the application for registration under section 12A of the Income-tax Act should have been condoned. It was found that the trustees were not aware of the requirement to file within the prescribed period, and the delay was considered bona fide. Consequently, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act were made applicable to the trust from its inception.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>