<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s activities fell under clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 80HHC, as the goods were processed, not merely traded. The decision under the Sales Tax Act was deemed irrelevant due to the wider scope of &quot;processed&quot; compared to &quot;manufactured.&quot; The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s computation of profits derived from export under clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 80HHC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:25:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s activities fell under clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 80HHC, as the goods were processed, not merely traded. The decision under the Sales Tax Act was deemed irrelevant due to the wider scope of &quot;processed&quot; compared to &quot;manufactured.&quot; The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s computation of profits derived from export under clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 80HHC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>