<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 434 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120137</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to hear the applicant&#039;s rectification of mistake application, finding that a significant contention was overlooked in the ex-parte order. The Tribunal identified an error, recalling the previous order and restoring the appeal to its original number. The appeal will be listed for a hearing to consider and address all grounds of appeal, rectifying the mistake and providing the applicant with a fair hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 434 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120137</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to hear the applicant&#039;s rectification of mistake application, finding that a significant contention was overlooked in the ex-parte order. The Tribunal identified an error, recalling the previous order and restoring the appeal to its original number. The appeal will be listed for a hearing to consider and address all grounds of appeal, rectifying the mistake and providing the applicant with a fair hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>