<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 414 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c), confirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s proper satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings, justified timing of penalty orders post-Tribunal decision, non-applicability of Explanation 5, valid consideration of sundry debtors, and substantiated additions based on seized material. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties on various grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:41:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 414 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c), confirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s proper satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings, justified timing of penalty orders post-Tribunal decision, non-applicability of Explanation 5, valid consideration of sundry debtors, and substantiated additions based on seized material. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties on various grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>