<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 535 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The transactions were deemed sales under section 45(1), not distributions under section 45(4), and the bad debts were correctly written off in accordance with the amended provisions of section 36(1)(vii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:46:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 535 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The transactions were deemed sales under section 45(1), not distributions under section 45(4), and the bad debts were correctly written off in accordance with the amended provisions of section 36(1)(vii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>