<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 532 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120105</link>
    <description>The tribunal addressed three issues: admission of additional evidence, disallowance of travelling expenses, and disallowance of car loan interest. It set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on additional evidence, directing reassessment by the AO. It upheld the disallowance of travelling expenses due to insufficient documentation and agreed with partial disallowance of car loan interest, acknowledging potential personal use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 532 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120105</link>
      <description>The tribunal addressed three issues: admission of additional evidence, disallowance of travelling expenses, and disallowance of car loan interest. It set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on additional evidence, directing reassessment by the AO. It upheld the disallowance of travelling expenses due to insufficient documentation and agreed with partial disallowance of car loan interest, acknowledging potential personal use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>