https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120101 The tribunal overturned the confiscation of Indian origin goods but upheld the confiscation of the truck in a case involving seized contraband concealed in a truck. The driver admitted guilt independently, absolving the transport company and goods' owner of involvement. Relying on precedent, the tribunal distinguished between "concealment" and "covering" of contraband, leading to the reversal of the tea bags' confiscation. The truck's confiscation was maintained under Section 115(2) as the driver acted as the owner's agent. The appeal resulted in the Indian origin goods' confiscation being overturned while the truck's confiscation was affirmed. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:15:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120101 The tribunal overturned the confiscation of Indian origin goods but upheld the confiscation of the truck in a case involving seized contraband concealed in a truck. The driver admitted guilt independently, absolving the transport company and goods' owner of involvement. Relying on precedent, the tribunal distinguished between "concealment" and "covering" of contraband, leading to the reversal of the tea bags' confiscation. The truck's confiscation was maintained under Section 115(2) as the driver acted as the owner's agent. The appeal resulted in the Indian origin goods' confiscation being overturned while the truck's confiscation was affirmed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120101