<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 515 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 36(1)(iii) for interest expenditure but directed reconsideration under section 57(iii) for the proportionate interest related to actual utilization of borrowed funds. The disallowance of professional fees paid for restructuring expenses was upheld as capital expenditure with no business nexus, as confirmed by the CIT(A) and Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 515 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 36(1)(iii) for interest expenditure but directed reconsideration under section 57(iii) for the proportionate interest related to actual utilization of borrowed funds. The disallowance of professional fees paid for restructuring expenses was upheld as capital expenditure with no business nexus, as confirmed by the CIT(A) and Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>