<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 409 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120051</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged the financial hardships faced by the appellants but did not grant waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery based on the classification issue of &quot;Strap Plap&quot; under Chapter 64 of the CETA Schedule. The Tribunal decided to proceed with the appeals, modifying the stay order for an early disposal of the case without requiring further deposit for the final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 409 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120051</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged the financial hardships faced by the appellants but did not grant waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery based on the classification issue of &quot;Strap Plap&quot; under Chapter 64 of the CETA Schedule. The Tribunal decided to proceed with the appeals, modifying the stay order for an early disposal of the case without requiring further deposit for the final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>