<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 448 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing exemption under section 10A without offsetting the losses of the non-10A unit. It concluded that the income from the 10A unit should be excluded before computing the gross total income. Consequently, the Tribunal permitted the carry forward of losses and depreciation of the non-10A unit, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 448 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing exemption under section 10A without offsetting the losses of the non-10A unit. It concluded that the income from the 10A unit should be excluded before computing the gross total income. Consequently, the Tribunal permitted the carry forward of losses and depreciation of the non-10A unit, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>