<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 577 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120041</link>
    <description>The appeal against the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit under CHALR, 2004 was allowed. The case was remanded for further proceedings as the Tribunal found procedural irregularities in the inquiry process, including lack of proper conduct and cross-examination. The Commissioner was directed to ensure a fair and thorough inquiry following principles of natural justice, emphasizing cooperation from the appellants during the re-conducted inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 577 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120041</link>
      <description>The appeal against the revocation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit under CHALR, 2004 was allowed. The case was remanded for further proceedings as the Tribunal found procedural irregularities in the inquiry process, including lack of proper conduct and cross-examination. The Commissioner was directed to ensure a fair and thorough inquiry following principles of natural justice, emphasizing cooperation from the appellants during the re-conducted inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>