<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held the reopening of the assessment under section 147 to be legally unsustainable due to lack of material indicating income escape. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction of Rs. 47 lakhs claimed by the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO. The appeal of the assessee was fully allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:51:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held the reopening of the assessment under section 147 to be legally unsustainable due to lack of material indicating income escape. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction of Rs. 47 lakhs claimed by the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO. The appeal of the assessee was fully allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>