<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 441 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120008</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The assessment under section 143(3) was validated, and the disallowances of Rs. 2,000 treated as a donation and Rs. 1,35,595 for expenses incurred through credit card were upheld. However, the addition of Rs. 60,22,000 as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) was deleted, as the provisions were deemed inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 441 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120008</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The assessment under section 143(3) was validated, and the disallowances of Rs. 2,000 treated as a donation and Rs. 1,35,595 for expenses incurred through credit card were upheld. However, the addition of Rs. 60,22,000 as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) was deleted, as the provisions were deemed inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>