https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120005 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation of excess goods and penalty imposition. The decision was based on discrepancies in stock verification attributed to the foaming nature of molasses. The alignment between State Excise and appellant's records indicated no physical excess, emphasizing the control of molasses by the State Excise department. The judgment highlighted the significance of accurate record-keeping and regulatory oversight in such cases. en-us Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:04:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120005 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation of excess goods and penalty imposition. The decision was based on discrepancies in stock verification attributed to the foaming nature of molasses. The alignment between State Excise and appellant's records indicated no physical excess, emphasizing the control of molasses by the State Excise department. The judgment highlighted the significance of accurate record-keeping and regulatory oversight in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120005