<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 394 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the confiscation and penalties imposed on the respondent due to lack of evidence indicating any violation of Central Excise Law. The appeal by the revenue against the order setting aside the confiscation and penalties was dismissed. The judgment was pronounced on 25th September 2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=157000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 394 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the confiscation and penalties imposed on the respondent due to lack of evidence indicating any violation of Central Excise Law. The appeal by the revenue against the order setting aside the confiscation and penalties was dismissed. The judgment was pronounced on 25th September 2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>