<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 439 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restoring them for a merits-based decision. It condoned the 42-day delay in filing the appeals, emphasizing the curable nature of the defect and the importance of substantial justice over technicalities. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to dispose of the appeals on merits after granting a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 439 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restoring them for a merits-based decision. It condoned the 42-day delay in filing the appeals, emphasizing the curable nature of the defect and the importance of substantial justice over technicalities. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to dispose of the appeals on merits after granting a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=120000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>