<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 376 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties on the Director of an exporting company for concealing duty, misdeclaration of goods, and fraudulent activities related to duty evasion. The penalties were imposed under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act due to the severity of the offenses committed. The Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider cited legal judgments and the claim of violation of natural justice led to a reevaluation of the appeal and an amendment to the previous order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:29:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 376 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties on the Director of an exporting company for concealing duty, misdeclaration of goods, and fraudulent activities related to duty evasion. The penalties were imposed under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act due to the severity of the offenses committed. The Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider cited legal judgments and the claim of violation of natural justice led to a reevaluation of the appeal and an amendment to the previous order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>