<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 374 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand for duty and interest due to non-fulfillment of export obligations and improper installation of imported capital goods. However, it annulled penalties and confiscation orders, determining that the goods were not subject to confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act. The appellants must promptly pay the interest liability, with potential further proceedings by Revenue if they fail to comply. The appeal was resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 374 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand for duty and interest due to non-fulfillment of export obligations and improper installation of imported capital goods. However, it annulled penalties and confiscation orders, determining that the goods were not subject to confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act. The appellants must promptly pay the interest liability, with potential further proceedings by Revenue if they fail to comply. The appeal was resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>