<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 372 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119971</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Department&#039;s application, rectifying its order to align with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in IPCA Laboratories Ltd. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, deciding in favor of the Department. The amended order allows the revenue&#039;s appeal, following the Supreme Court and High Court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 372 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119971</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Department&#039;s application, rectifying its order to align with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in IPCA Laboratories Ltd. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, deciding in favor of the Department. The amended order allows the revenue&#039;s appeal, following the Supreme Court and High Court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>