<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 409 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119930</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant as a manufacturer of excisable pipes, rejected the argument that the goods were not excisable, and affirmed the timeliness of the show cause notice under Section 11A. The Tribunal provided guidance on the pre-deposit of duty to ensure compliance with the interim stay of the order pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 409 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119930</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant as a manufacturer of excisable pipes, rejected the argument that the goods were not excisable, and affirmed the timeliness of the show cause notice under Section 11A. The Tribunal provided guidance on the pre-deposit of duty to ensure compliance with the interim stay of the order pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>