<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 351 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed deductions for belated payments towards Provident Fund and ESI made before the due date for filing the return under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act for assessment year 2001-02. It held that the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2003, should be applied retrospectively based on the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of the first proviso to section 43B, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; disallowance orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:04:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 351 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed deductions for belated payments towards Provident Fund and ESI made before the due date for filing the return under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act for assessment year 2001-02. It held that the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2003, should be applied retrospectively based on the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of the first proviso to section 43B, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; disallowance orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>