<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 407 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the appellant must pay duty in accordance with statutory provisions. The dispute centered on the correct valuation of goods for customs duty assessment, with the Commissioner&#039;s issuance of a Public Notice with an incorrect exchange rate being challenged. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument that they had paid duty correctly based on the original notice, the Tribunal affirmed the demand for payment following the corrigendum aligning the rate with the Warehousing Bills of Entry date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:50:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 407 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling that the appellant must pay duty in accordance with statutory provisions. The dispute centered on the correct valuation of goods for customs duty assessment, with the Commissioner&#039;s issuance of a Public Notice with an incorrect exchange rate being challenged. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument that they had paid duty correctly based on the original notice, the Tribunal affirmed the demand for payment following the corrigendum aligning the rate with the Warehousing Bills of Entry date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>