<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 342 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119896</link>
    <description>Income from fruit sales qualifies as agricultural income only when derived from agricultural land through basic agricultural operations; subsequent activities qualify only if ancillary to and continuous with those operations. Where only a right to pluck fruit is acquired, without a lease of agricultural land or proof of basic agricultural operations, the receipts are assessable as business income. Depreciation on a car may be partly disallowed where the claimed hiring arrangement lacks supporting agreements or accounts, appears nominal, and personal use cannot be excluded. On the stated facts, fruit-sale income was treated as business income and partial depreciation disallowance was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 342 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119896</link>
      <description>Income from fruit sales qualifies as agricultural income only when derived from agricultural land through basic agricultural operations; subsequent activities qualify only if ancillary to and continuous with those operations. Where only a right to pluck fruit is acquired, without a lease of agricultural land or proof of basic agricultural operations, the receipts are assessable as business income. Depreciation on a car may be partly disallowed where the claimed hiring arrangement lacks supporting agreements or accounts, appears nominal, and personal use cannot be excluded. On the stated facts, fruit-sale income was treated as business income and partial depreciation disallowance was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>