<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 398 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119895</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission resolved a case under Section 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 involving the clearance of a Volkswagen Car at Air Cargo Complex, Mumbai. After de novo adjudication, the car&#039;s value was re-determined, leading to settlement under Section 127C(7) with customs duty set at Rs. 27,69,067 based on the manufacturer&#039;s invoice. Immunities from fine, penalty, and prosecution were granted to the applicant and co-applicant due to full disclosure and cooperation. The settlement would be void if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation, with the delay in the Revenue&#039;s verification report submission addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:27:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 398 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119895</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission resolved a case under Section 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 involving the clearance of a Volkswagen Car at Air Cargo Complex, Mumbai. After de novo adjudication, the car&#039;s value was re-determined, leading to settlement under Section 127C(7) with customs duty set at Rs. 27,69,067 based on the manufacturer&#039;s invoice. Immunities from fine, penalty, and prosecution were granted to the applicant and co-applicant due to full disclosure and cooperation. The settlement would be void if obtained through fraud or misrepresentation, with the delay in the Revenue&#039;s verification report submission addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>