<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 399 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the declared FOB value and Present Market Value, granting the exporters entitlement to the claimed drawback. It ruled that the goods were not liable to confiscation, and penalties imposed by the Commissioner were unsustainable. The Tribunal applied the doctrine of merger, making a prior decision binding, and allowed the appeals filed by the exporter&#039;s company, its officers, and shipping agencies, while dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 399 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the declared FOB value and Present Market Value, granting the exporters entitlement to the claimed drawback. It ruled that the goods were not liable to confiscation, and penalties imposed by the Commissioner were unsustainable. The Tribunal applied the doctrine of merger, making a prior decision binding, and allowed the appeals filed by the exporter&#039;s company, its officers, and shipping agencies, while dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>