<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 488 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119844</link>
    <description>Waiver of balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted pending appeal in a dispute over the dutiability of intermediate products used in precious metal manufacture. The appellant challenged the demand on non-marketability and limitation grounds, and the Tribunal treated both issues as contentious and arguable at the interim stage without expressing any final view on merits or limitation. Noting conditional relief granted in a materially similar case involving an identically situated assessee, the Tribunal required a bank guarantee for 25% of the confirmed duty and waived the balance pre-deposit and penalty amounts for the time being.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:29:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 488 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119844</link>
      <description>Waiver of balance pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted pending appeal in a dispute over the dutiability of intermediate products used in precious metal manufacture. The appellant challenged the demand on non-marketability and limitation grounds, and the Tribunal treated both issues as contentious and arguable at the interim stage without expressing any final view on merits or limitation. Noting conditional relief granted in a materially similar case involving an identically situated assessee, the Tribunal required a bank guarantee for 25% of the confirmed duty and waived the balance pre-deposit and penalty amounts for the time being.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>