<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 480 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119831</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, which was delayed by about 62 days due to unforeseen circumstances and bureaucratic challenges faced by the appellant. The delay was justified by various official engagements, unforeseen events, heavy rainfall, flooding, computer system damage, and other disruptions in government offices. The court emphasized the need for flexibility in cases involving government functioning and public interest, ultimately permitting the appeal to proceed despite the delay. The judgment highlights the importance of considering genuine difficulties faced by parties when assessing delays in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:20:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 480 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119831</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, which was delayed by about 62 days due to unforeseen circumstances and bureaucratic challenges faced by the appellant. The delay was justified by various official engagements, unforeseen events, heavy rainfall, flooding, computer system damage, and other disruptions in government offices. The court emphasized the need for flexibility in cases involving government functioning and public interest, ultimately permitting the appeal to proceed despite the delay. The judgment highlights the importance of considering genuine difficulties faced by parties when assessing delays in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>