<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 371 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, overturning the tax authorities&#039; decisions. It determined that the industrial shed was a long-term capital asset held from 28-12-1994, when the first instalment was paid. Consequently, the sale of the shed on 15-12-2000 resulted in a long-term capital loss/gain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 371 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, overturning the tax authorities&#039; decisions. It determined that the industrial shed was a long-term capital asset held from 28-12-1994, when the first instalment was paid. Consequently, the sale of the shed on 15-12-2000 resulted in a long-term capital loss/gain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>