<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 370 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and cross-objection, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of expenses related to exempt income under u/s 14A of the Income-tax Act. It held that all expenses related to exempt income should be considered, not just those from which dividend was earned. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s narrow interpretation and excluded certain expenses while remitting the matter of interest paid for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:22:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 370 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and cross-objection, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of expenses related to exempt income under u/s 14A of the Income-tax Act. It held that all expenses related to exempt income should be considered, not just those from which dividend was earned. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s narrow interpretation and excluded certain expenses while remitting the matter of interest paid for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>