<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 366 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119808</link>
    <description>The court ruled that interest income from suppliers and from customers on delayed payment of sale consideration is eligible for deduction under section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, interest income from fixed deposits with the bank is not eligible for such deduction. The court rejected the assessee&#039;s argument for netting interest income and allowed the appeal in part, providing partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 366 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119808</link>
      <description>The court ruled that interest income from suppliers and from customers on delayed payment of sale consideration is eligible for deduction under section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, interest income from fixed deposits with the bank is not eligible for such deduction. The court rejected the assessee&#039;s argument for netting interest income and allowed the appeal in part, providing partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>