<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 365 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for the assessment years 1989-90 to 1992-93, upholding the denial of exemption and the valuation of properties. However, for the assessment years 1993-94 to 1999-2000, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, holding that the partly constructed property in Muttambalam village was not an &quot;asset&quot; under section 2(ea) of the Wealth-tax Act and should be excluded from the net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 365 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals for the assessment years 1989-90 to 1992-93, upholding the denial of exemption and the valuation of properties. However, for the assessment years 1993-94 to 1999-2000, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, holding that the partly constructed property in Muttambalam village was not an &quot;asset&quot; under section 2(ea) of the Wealth-tax Act and should be excluded from the net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>