<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 394 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), confirming that the imported LPG should be classified under Chapter 271119.00 and that the respondent was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 82/2004. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeal and maintained that the change in classification by the department was unjustified and contrary to the established classification practice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:48:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 394 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), confirming that the imported LPG should be classified under Chapter 271119.00 and that the respondent was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 82/2004. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s appeal and maintained that the change in classification by the department was unjustified and contrary to the established classification practice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>